79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. CMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

SFQ79FDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025

Summary

This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes specifically for Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) lending. The trend provides insights into the complexity and resolution of lending disputes in the commercial real estate financing market.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

The metric reflects the evolving landscape of commercial mortgage lending and potential friction points in collateral valuation and dispute resolution. Economists use this data to assess the efficiency and risk management practices in the CMBS lending ecosystem.

Methodology

Data is collected through survey-based reporting from financial institutions and lending professionals involved in commercial mortgage transactions.

Historical Context

This trend is used by policymakers and financial regulators to monitor potential systemic risks and lending market dynamics in commercial real estate.

Key Facts

  • Focuses specifically on Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) lending disputes
  • Measures changes in dispute duration and persistence over three-month periods
  • Provides insight into lending market efficiency and potential friction points

FAQs

Q: What does a decrease in dispute duration indicate?

A: A decrease suggests improved efficiency in resolving lending disputes and potentially more standardized valuation practices in the CMBS market.

Q: Why are CMBS lending disputes important?

A: These disputes can signal underlying risks, valuation challenges, or systemic issues in commercial real estate lending markets.

Q: How frequently is this data updated?

A: The data is typically reported on a quarterly basis, tracking changes over three-month intervals.

Q: Who uses this economic indicator?

A: Financial regulators, economists, real estate investors, and risk management professionals use this data to assess market conditions.

Q: What limitations exist in this data?

A: The indicator relies on survey responses and may not capture every nuanced dispute in the CMBS lending market.

Related News

Related Trends

21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ21DDCNR

41) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Nonprice Terms Incorporated in New or Renegotiated Otc Derivatives Master Agreements Put in Place with Your Institution's Client Changed?| D. Triggers and Covenants. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ41DRBUNR

50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

OTCDQ50DISNR

70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

SFQ70A3RBUNR

25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: First in Importance

ALLQ25A3MINR

74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

ALLQ74B3TSNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, 79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. CMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably [SFQ79FDCNR], retrieved from FRED.

Last Checked: 8/1/2025