69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Somewhat
SFQ69EONR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
2.00
Year-over-Year Change
100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks liquidity and market functioning in non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Provides critical insights into secondary mortgage market conditions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures changes in market dynamics for non-agency RMBS, reflecting investor sentiment and market health in mortgage-backed securities.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial market participants and institutional investors quarterly.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to assess mortgage market stability and risk.
Key Facts
- Quarterly assessment of market conditions
- Focuses on non-agency mortgage securities
- Indicates market sentiment and risk perception
FAQs
Q: What are non-agency RMBS?
A: Mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Q: Why is RMBS market liquidity important?
A: Reflects overall health of mortgage lending and investor confidence in real estate markets.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Quarterly survey providing current market condition assessments.
Q: Who uses this market liquidity data?
A: Investors, financial analysts, regulators, and economic policymakers monitor these trends.
Q: What does 'deteriorated somewhat' indicate?
A: Suggests slight decline in market trading efficiency and investor confidence.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ74B3TCNR
76) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
SFQ76ISNR
33) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ33RBUNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ19B2MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ66A1TSNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ70A3TCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Market Liquidity (SFQ69EONR), retrieved from FRED.