78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. CMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

SFQ78FDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025

Summary

This trend tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) lending over a three-month period. The metric provides insight into potential stress or shifts in commercial real estate lending practices.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

The indicator measures the volume of disputes related to lending against CMBS, which can signal underlying tensions in commercial real estate financing. Economists use this data to assess market liquidity, risk perception, and potential credit market constraints.

Methodology

Data is collected through systematic reporting from financial institutions and aggregated by the Federal Reserve to track lending dispute trends.

Historical Context

This metric is used by policymakers and investors to understand potential risks and changes in commercial real estate lending dynamics.

Key Facts

  • Tracks disputes in commercial mortgage-backed securities lending
  • Provides insight into potential market stress in real estate financing
  • Measures changes over a three-month period

FAQs

Q: What does a decrease in CMBS lending disputes indicate?

A: A decrease might suggest improved lending conditions or reduced market tensions in commercial real estate financing.

Q: How frequently is this data updated?

A: The Federal Reserve typically updates this metric on a quarterly basis, providing periodic insights into lending market dynamics.

Q: Why are CMBS lending disputes important?

A: These disputes can signal potential risks, market liquidity challenges, and overall health of commercial real estate lending.

Q: Who uses this type of economic data?

A: Investors, financial analysts, policymakers, and real estate professionals use this data to assess market conditions and make informed decisions.

Q: What limitations exist in this data?

A: The metric provides a snapshot of disputes and may not capture all nuanced market dynamics or long-term trends.

Related News

Related Trends

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ31A52MINR

76) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

SFQ76ISNR

78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ78ERBUNR

56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

ALLQ56B4TSNR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ37A12MINR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: First In Importance

CTQ37B3MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, 78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. CMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably [SFQ78FDCNR], retrieved from FRED.

Last Checked: 8/1/2025

78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. CMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably | US Economic Trends