78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

ALLQ78AISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-grade corporate bond lending. Provides critical insight into institutional lending dispute dynamics.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This trend measures the frequency and intensity of disputes in corporate bond lending transactions. It reflects market friction and operational challenges.

Methodology

Quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volume changes.

Historical Context

Used by regulators to monitor lending market transparency and operational efficiency.

Key Facts

  • Quarterly dispute volume metric
  • Focuses on high-grade corporate bonds
  • Indicates market operational challenges

FAQs

Q: What causes lending disputes?

A: Differences in valuation, collateral quality, or transaction terms can trigger disputes.

Q: How significant are these disputes?

A: They can indicate market stress and potential friction in securities lending.

Q: Why track high-grade corporate bond disputes?

A: These bonds represent a significant segment of institutional lending markets.

Q: How do regulators use this information?

A: To assess market transparency and potential systemic risks in lending.

Q: What are the data collection limitations?

A: Relies on self-reported institutional survey responses.

Related News

Related Trends

15) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Trading REITs Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

CTQ15ISNR

74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably

ALLQ74B2TCNR

72) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Cmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ72RBUNR

46) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Credit Derivatives Referencing Securitized Products (Such as Specific ABS or MBS Tranches and Associated Indexes) Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

OTCDQ46ARBUNR

21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| B. Etfs. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ21BDCNR

55) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the High-Grade Corporate Bond Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Considerably

SFQ55PNNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Bond Lending Disputes (ALLQ78AISNR), retrieved from FRED.