78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ78AISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-grade corporate bond lending. Provides critical insight into institutional lending dispute dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend measures the frequency and intensity of disputes in corporate bond lending transactions. It reflects market friction and operational challenges.
Methodology
Quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volume changes.
Historical Context
Used by regulators to monitor lending market transparency and operational efficiency.
Key Facts
- Quarterly dispute volume metric
- Focuses on high-grade corporate bonds
- Indicates market operational challenges
FAQs
Q: What causes lending disputes?
A: Differences in valuation, collateral quality, or transaction terms can trigger disputes.
Q: How significant are these disputes?
A: They can indicate market stress and potential friction in securities lending.
Q: Why track high-grade corporate bond disputes?
A: These bonds represent a significant segment of institutional lending markets.
Q: How do regulators use this information?
A: To assess market transparency and potential systemic risks in lending.
Q: What are the data collection limitations?
A: Relies on self-reported institutional survey responses.
Related Trends
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ43AICNR
72) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Cmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ72DSNR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Fx. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ50ADCNR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ79EISNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ39GDSNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including MBS and ABS. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ51EISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Bond Lending Disputes (ALLQ78AISNR), retrieved from FRED.