79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ79EISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in lending dispute duration and persistence for non-agency RMBS. Provides insights into financial market complexity and risk assessment.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures shifts in collateral dispute characteristics for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities. Indicates potential market friction and lending challenges.
Methodology
Calculated through quarterly survey responses about dispute intensity and duration.
Historical Context
Critical for understanding financial market risk and lending environment dynamics.
Key Facts
- Indicates non-agency RMBS dispute trends
- Reflects lending market complexity
- Helps assess financial market friction
FAQs
Q: What does ALLQ79EISNR measure?
A: Tracks changes in duration and persistence of lending disputes for non-agency RMBS.
Q: Why are mortgage dispute trends important?
A: They reveal potential risks and friction in mortgage-backed securities markets.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Quarterly updates provide ongoing insights into lending dispute dynamics.
Q: What do increased disputes indicate?
A: May signal growing complexity or uncertainty in mortgage lending markets.
Q: Are there limitations to this data?
A: Represents survey perceptions and may not capture entire market complexity.
Related Trends
8) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Hedge Funds Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ08DSNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ51CDSNR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ06B73MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ66A3ESNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ37A7MINR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ74B4ECNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Lending Dispute Changes (ALLQ79EISNR), retrieved from FRED.