51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ51FDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in commodity contract dispute duration and persistence. Provides insights into financial market transaction complexity and dispute resolution trends.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures shifts in commodity contract dispute characteristics. It helps economists understand financial market transaction dynamics.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking contract dispute metrics.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess market transaction stability.
Key Facts
- Tracks commodity contract dispute trends
- Indicates market transaction complexity
- Provides regulatory insight
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It tracks changes in commodity contract dispute duration and persistence across financial markets.
Q: Why are commodity contract disputes important?
A: They reveal potential friction and complexity in financial market transactions and relationships.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically collected and reported on a quarterly basis by financial institutions.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, and market researchers use this to understand transaction dynamics.
Q: What does a decrease in disputes indicate?
A: Potentially improved contract terms or more efficient market negotiation processes.
Related Trends
30) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ30RBUNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ19B33MINR
11) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Trading REITs as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
CTQ11TSNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ66A2TCNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66B1ESNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37A32MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Commodity Contract Disputes (OTCDQ51FDCNR), retrieved from FRED.