51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ51CRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
14.00
Year-over-Year Change
-6.67%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes specifically related to equity contracts. The metric provides insights into financial market stability and potential friction points in contract negotiations.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The trend measures the stability of equity contract disputes over a three-month period, reflecting potential challenges in financial transactions and market interactions. Economists use this data to assess the smoothness of financial contract settlements and potential systemic risks.
Methodology
Data is collected through surveys and reporting mechanisms from financial institutions and market participants tracking contract dispute characteristics.
Historical Context
This indicator is used by regulators and financial analysts to understand potential friction in equity markets and assess overall market efficiency.
Key Facts
- Tracks changes in equity contract dispute duration over three-month periods
- Provides insight into potential market friction and settlement challenges
- Helps assess overall financial market transaction smoothness
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It measures the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes specifically in equity contracts over a three-month period.
Q: Why are contract dispute metrics important?
A: These metrics help understand potential inefficiencies and friction points in financial markets, which can impact overall market performance and risk assessment.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically, this data is collected and reported on a quarterly basis, providing a snapshot of market conditions.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, economists, and market researchers use this data to assess market efficiency and potential systemic risks.
Q: What does 'Remained Basically Unchanged' mean?
A: This suggests that the duration and persistence of equity contract disputes have not significantly changed during the reported period.
Related Trends
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ19A6MINR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A12MINR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ39DICNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ25B53MINR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ39DDCNR
54) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
SFQ54DSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged [OTCDQ51CRBUNR], retrieved from FRED.
Last Checked: 8/1/2025