51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ51CRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
14.00
Year-over-Year Change
-6.67%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes specifically related to equity contracts. The metric provides insights into financial market stability and potential friction points in contract negotiations.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The trend measures the stability of equity contract disputes over a three-month period, reflecting potential challenges in financial transactions and market interactions. Economists use this data to assess the smoothness of financial contract settlements and potential systemic risks.
Methodology
Data is collected through surveys and reporting mechanisms from financial institutions and market participants tracking contract dispute characteristics.
Historical Context
This indicator is used by regulators and financial analysts to understand potential friction in equity markets and assess overall market efficiency.
Key Facts
- Tracks changes in equity contract dispute duration over three-month periods
- Provides insight into potential market friction and settlement challenges
- Helps assess overall financial market transaction smoothness
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It measures the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes specifically in equity contracts over a three-month period.
Q: Why are contract dispute metrics important?
A: These metrics help understand potential inefficiencies and friction points in financial markets, which can impact overall market performance and risk assessment.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically, this data is collected and reported on a quarterly basis, providing a snapshot of market conditions.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, economists, and market researchers use this data to assess market efficiency and potential systemic risks.
Q: What does 'Remained Basically Unchanged' mean?
A: This suggests that the duration and persistence of equity contract disputes have not significantly changed during the reported period.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
27) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Insurance Companies Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ27ISNR
7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ07RBUNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37A62MINR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ06B7MINR
71) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Cmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ71RBUNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ39BDSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged [OTCDQ51CRBUNR], retrieved from FRED.
Last Checked: 8/1/2025