54) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
SFQ54DSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in demand for term funding of high-grade corporate bonds over three months. Provides critical insight into corporate borrowing trends.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks corporate clients' appetite for long-term bond funding. It reflects broader economic investment sentiment.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial institutions reporting changes in term funding demand.
Historical Context
Used to assess corporate investment and borrowing strategies.
Key Facts
- Indicates decreased demand for long-term funding
- Reflects potential corporate investment caution
- Signals potential economic uncertainty
FAQs
Q: What does decreased term funding demand mean?
A: Suggests corporations are reducing long-term bond borrowing over the past three months.
Q: Why track term funding demand?
A: It provides insights into corporate investment strategies and economic confidence.
Q: What qualifies as term funding?
A: Funding with a maturity greater than 30 days for high-grade corporate bonds.
Q: How might this impact investors?
A: Indicates potential shifts in corporate borrowing and investment landscape.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Quarterly surveys capture changes in corporate funding preferences.
Related Trends
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ19A63MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ66A2RBUNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ56A4TCNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ51CDCNR
23) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Insurance Companies as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ23TCNR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ43AICNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Term Funding Demand (SFQ54DSNR), retrieved from FRED.