39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ39DICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in mark and collateral disputes with mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments. Provides critical insights into institutional trading and settlement processes.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks dispute volumes in financial transactions among institutional investors. It reflects potential friction in trading and settlement mechanisms.
Methodology
Quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volume changes.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess market transaction efficiency.
Key Facts
- Quarterly institutional dispute tracking
- Covers mutual funds, ETFs, and pension plans
- Indicates market transaction complexity
FAQs
Q: What types of institutions are included in this survey?
A: Mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments are surveyed about trading disputes.
Q: Why are trading disputes important?
A: They can indicate inefficiencies or challenges in financial market settlement processes.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: The survey is conducted quarterly to monitor changes in dispute volumes.
Q: What might cause an increase in disputes?
A: Market volatility, complex financial instruments, or changing regulatory environments.
Q: Are there potential limitations to this data?
A: Survey represents reported disputes and may not capture all market transaction nuances.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ70A3ESNR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ06B72MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ66B2RBUNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ19B13MINR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ39ERBUNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ25B63MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Institutional Trading Disputes (CTQ39DICNR), retrieved from FRED.