39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ39DDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for institutional investment clients over three-month periods. Provides insight into financial service sector dispute dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures dispute volume for mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments. Indicates potential friction in financial transactions and client relationships.
Methodology
Collected through financial service industry surveys and reporting mechanisms.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial institutions to assess market interaction quality.
Key Facts
- Tracks institutional investment client disputes
- Covers mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans
- Quarterly reporting mechanism
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks volume of mark and collateral disputes for institutional investment clients over three months.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: Disputes can indicate potential friction or complexity in financial transactions between institutions.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically reported quarterly by financial institutions and regulatory bodies.
Q: What types of clients are included?
A: Mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments are covered in this series.
Q: How can investors use this information?
A: Helps assess potential risks and transaction complexities in institutional investing.
Related News

Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...

S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...

U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...

U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...

U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...

U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
41) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Nonprice Terms Incorporated in New or Renegotiated Otc Derivatives Master Agreements Put in Place with Your Institution's Client Changed?| D. Triggers and Covenants. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ41DTSNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ78ERBUNR
9) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Availability of Additional (and Currently Unutilized) Financial Leverage Under Agreements Currently in Place with Hedge Funds (for Example, Under Prime Broker, Warehouse Agreements, and Other Committed but Undrawn or Partly Drawn Facilities) Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ09ISNR
9) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Availability of Additional (and Currently Unutilized) Financial Leverage Under Agreements Currently in Place with Hedge Funds (for Example, Under Prime Broker, Warehouse Agreements, and Other Committed but Undrawn or Partly Drawn Facilities) Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ09DCNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ25B73MINR
24) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Insurance Companies Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ24ESNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ39DDCNR), retrieved from FRED.