39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ39DDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for institutional investment clients over three-month periods. Provides insight into financial service sector dispute dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures dispute volume for mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments. Indicates potential friction in financial transactions and client relationships.
Methodology
Collected through financial service industry surveys and reporting mechanisms.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial institutions to assess market interaction quality.
Key Facts
- Tracks institutional investment client disputes
- Covers mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans
- Quarterly reporting mechanism
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks volume of mark and collateral disputes for institutional investment clients over three months.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: Disputes can indicate potential friction or complexity in financial transactions between institutions.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically reported quarterly by financial institutions and regulatory bodies.
Q: What types of clients are included?
A: Mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments are covered in this series.
Q: How can investors use this information?
A: Helps assess potential risks and transaction complexities in institutional investing.
Related Trends
45) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Credit Derivatives Referencing Corporates (Single-Name Corporates or Corporate Indexes) Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ45ADSNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ39DRBUNR
63) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ63ISNR
68) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Non-Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ68ISNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ62A1ESNR
24) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Insurance Companies Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ24ECNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ39DDCNR), retrieved from FRED.