39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ39DDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for institutional investment clients over three-month periods. Provides insight into financial service sector dispute dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures dispute volume for mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments. Indicates potential friction in financial transactions and client relationships.
Methodology
Collected through financial service industry surveys and reporting mechanisms.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial institutions to assess market interaction quality.
Key Facts
- Tracks institutional investment client disputes
- Covers mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans
- Quarterly reporting mechanism
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks volume of mark and collateral disputes for institutional investment clients over three months.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: Disputes can indicate potential friction or complexity in financial transactions between institutions.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically reported quarterly by financial institutions and regulatory bodies.
Q: What types of clients are included?
A: Mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments are covered in this series.
Q: How can investors use this information?
A: Helps assess potential risks and transaction complexities in institutional investing.
Related Trends
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ78ADSNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ66A3TCNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ19A63MINR
15) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Trading REITs Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ15DCNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ37B7MINR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ74A1ECNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ39DDCNR), retrieved from FRED.