78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ78ADSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in mark and collateral dispute volumes for high-grade corporate bonds. Provides insight into financial market transaction complexities.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks disputes in high-grade corporate bond transactions. It reflects potential friction in financial market interactions.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses from financial market participants.
Historical Context
Used to assess efficiency and challenges in corporate bond markets.
Key Facts
- Tracks high-grade corporate bond transaction disputes
- Indicates potential market transaction challenges
- Part of comprehensive market assessment
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-grade corporate bonds. Reflects market transaction complexities.
Q: Why are bond transaction disputes important?
A: They can indicate potential inefficiencies or challenges in financial market interactions.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Typically gathered quarterly through financial market surveys.
Q: What insights can this provide?
A: Helps understand potential friction in corporate bond market transactions.
Q: What are the data's limitations?
A: Represents reported disputes and may not capture all market nuances.
Related Trends
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Considerably
SFQ69TNNR
42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC FX Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ42ADSNR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading REITs Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ13A52MINR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ56A3RBUNR
27) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Insurance Companies Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ27DCNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ39ERBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Lending Market Questionnaire (ALLQ78ADSNR), retrieved from FRED.