78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ78ADSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in mark and collateral dispute volumes for high-grade corporate bonds. Provides insight into financial market transaction complexities.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks disputes in high-grade corporate bond transactions. It reflects potential friction in financial market interactions.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses from financial market participants.
Historical Context
Used to assess efficiency and challenges in corporate bond markets.
Key Facts
- Tracks high-grade corporate bond transaction disputes
- Indicates potential market transaction challenges
- Part of comprehensive market assessment
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-grade corporate bonds. Reflects market transaction complexities.
Q: Why are bond transaction disputes important?
A: They can indicate potential inefficiencies or challenges in financial market interactions.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Typically gathered quarterly through financial market surveys.
Q: What insights can this provide?
A: Helps understand potential friction in corporate bond market transactions.
Q: What are the data's limitations?
A: Represents reported disputes and may not capture all market nuances.
Related Trends
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ39ERBUNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ39DISNR
75) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Consumer Abs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ75ICNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ66A2TSNR
76) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
SFQ76DSNR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ22ISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Lending Market Questionnaire (ALLQ78ADSNR), retrieved from FRED.