76) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
SFQ76DSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in demand for term funding with consumer asset-backed securities over three months. Provides insight into financial market lending dynamics and credit market conditions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures shifts in institutional client demand for longer-term funding in consumer asset-backed securities markets. It reflects broader credit market sentiment.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking funding demand trends.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to assess credit market liquidity and lending conditions.
Key Facts
- Measures institutional funding demand changes
- Focuses on consumer asset-backed securities
- Tracks three-month lending market shifts
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It tracks changes in demand for term funding with consumer asset-backed securities over three months.
Q: Why is this data important?
A: Provides insights into credit market conditions and institutional lending trends.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically collected and reported on a quarterly basis through financial institution surveys.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Regulators, investors, and financial analysts monitoring credit market dynamics.
Q: What limitations exist in this data?
A: Represents survey responses and may not capture entire market complexity.
Related Trends
12) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Trading Reits Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ12RBUNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ62A3ECNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ70B4TCNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ40DDCNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ70A3TSNR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading Reits Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ13A1MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Term Funding Demand (SFQ76DSNR), retrieved from FRED.