40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ40DDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
This economic trend measures changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes with mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments over the past three months. It provides insight into dispute dynamics within these institutional investment channels.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The CTQ40DDCNR series tracks qualitative survey responses from financial institutions regarding the dispute environment with specific client types. It helps monitor evolving counterparty risk and market functioning concerns.
Methodology
The data is collected through a quarterly survey of financial institutions conducted by the U.S. Federal Reserve.
Historical Context
This trend is closely watched by policymakers and market participants to assess counterparty risks and overall financial market conditions.
Key Facts
- This trend tracks dispute duration with institutional investors.
- A 'decreased considerably' response indicates improved dispute resolution.
- The data provides insight into counterparty risk and market functioning.
FAQs
Q: What does this economic trend measure?
A: This trend measures changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes between financial institutions and their mutual fund, ETF, pension plan, and endowment clients.
Q: Why is this trend relevant for users or analysts?
A: This trend provides important insight into evolving counterparty risk and market functioning dynamics within these key institutional investment channels.
Q: How is this data collected or calculated?
A: The data is collected through a quarterly survey of financial institutions conducted by the U.S. Federal Reserve.
Q: How is this trend used in economic policy?
A: Policymakers and market participants closely monitor this trend to assess counterparty risks and overall financial market conditions.
Q: Are there update delays or limitations?
A: The data is published on a quarterly basis with a short lag, providing timely insight into dispute dynamics.
Related Trends
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ52A4ESNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37B52MINR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37A22MINR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ70B4ESNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37A62MINR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including Mbs and Abs. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ51EISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably (CTQ40DDCNR), retrieved from FRED.