40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

CTQ40DDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025

Summary

This economic trend measures changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes with mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments over the past three months. It provides insight into dispute dynamics within these institutional investment channels.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

The CTQ40DDCNR series tracks qualitative survey responses from financial institutions regarding the dispute environment with specific client types. It helps monitor evolving counterparty risk and market functioning concerns.

Methodology

The data is collected through a quarterly survey of financial institutions conducted by the U.S. Federal Reserve.

Historical Context

This trend is closely watched by policymakers and market participants to assess counterparty risks and overall financial market conditions.

Key Facts

  • This trend tracks dispute duration with institutional investors.
  • A 'decreased considerably' response indicates improved dispute resolution.
  • The data provides insight into counterparty risk and market functioning.

FAQs

Q: What does this economic trend measure?

A: This trend measures changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes between financial institutions and their mutual fund, ETF, pension plan, and endowment clients.

Q: Why is this trend relevant for users or analysts?

A: This trend provides important insight into evolving counterparty risk and market functioning dynamics within these key institutional investment channels.

Q: How is this data collected or calculated?

A: The data is collected through a quarterly survey of financial institutions conducted by the U.S. Federal Reserve.

Q: How is this trend used in economic policy?

A: Policymakers and market participants closely monitor this trend to assess counterparty risks and overall financial market conditions.

Q: Are there update delays or limitations?

A: The data is published on a quarterly basis with a short lag, providing timely insight into dispute dynamics.

Related News

Related Trends

35) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Nonfinancial Corporations as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

ALLQ35ESNR

74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

ALLQ74A3ESNR

12) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Trading Reits Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

ALLQ12ESNR

56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

SFQ56B1TSNR

78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

SFQ78BDCNR

35) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Nonfinancial Corporations as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

CTQ35ESNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, 40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably (CTQ40DDCNR), retrieved from FRED.
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably | US Economic Trends