39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ39BDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
This economic indicator tracks changes in the volume of mark and collateral disputes with hedge fund clients over the past three months. It provides insights into the level of disagreement and uncertainty in the financial markets.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The Federal Reserve's 'Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?' survey measures the shift in mark and collateral disputes with hedge fund clients. This metric is used to gauge market volatility and counterparty risk.
Methodology
The data is collected through a quarterly survey of primary dealers.
Historical Context
This indicator is closely monitored by policymakers and financial analysts to assess market conditions and risks.
Key Facts
- The indicator tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes with hedge fund clients.
- A decrease in dispute volume signals reduced uncertainty and counterparty risk.
- The data is collected through a quarterly Federal Reserve survey of primary dealers.
FAQs
Q: What does this economic trend measure?
A: This indicator tracks changes in the volume of mark and collateral disputes between primary dealers and their hedge fund clients.
Q: Why is this trend relevant for users or analysts?
A: The level of mark and collateral disputes provides insights into market volatility and counterparty risk, which are closely monitored by policymakers and financial analysts.
Q: How is this data collected or calculated?
A: The data is collected through a quarterly survey of primary dealers conducted by the Federal Reserve.
Q: How is this trend used in economic policy?
A: This indicator is used by policymakers and financial analysts to assess market conditions and risks, which informs policy decisions and investment strategies.
Q: Are there update delays or limitations?
A: The data is reported on a quarterly basis, so there may be a delay in reflecting the latest market conditions.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ56A3TCNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ62B2TCNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ70A2ESNR
68) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Non-Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ68RBUNR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. CMBS. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
SFQ79FISNR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ06A63MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 'Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably' (CTQ39BDCNR), retrieved from FRED.