51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably

ALLQ51BICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

-100.00%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes related to interest rate contracts over a three-month period. The trend provides insights into financial market tensions and potential systemic risks in interest rate-based financial transactions.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

The metric reflects the increasing complexity and potential disputes in interest rate contract settlements, which can signal underlying market stress or contractual challenges. Economists use this data to assess financial market friction and potential systemic risks in interest rate-related transactions.

Methodology

Data is collected through surveys and reporting mechanisms from financial institutions, tracking the frequency and duration of disputes in interest rate contract settlements.

Historical Context

This indicator is used by policymakers and financial regulators to monitor potential systemic risks and market inefficiencies in interest rate contract negotiations.

Key Facts

  • Tracks increasing duration of mark and collateral disputes in interest rate contracts
  • Provides insight into potential financial market tensions
  • Measures changes over a three-month period

FAQs

Q: What does this economic indicator measure?

A: It measures the duration and persistence of disputes in interest rate contract settlements over a three-month period, indicating potential market friction.

Q: Why are interest rate contract disputes important?

A: These disputes can signal underlying market stress, potential systemic risks, and challenges in financial transaction settlements.

Q: How is this data collected?

A: The data is gathered through surveys and reporting mechanisms from financial institutions tracking contract dispute frequencies.

Q: Who uses this economic indicator?

A: Policymakers, financial regulators, and economists use this data to assess market conditions and potential risks.

Q: How often is this data updated?

A: The indicator tracks changes over a three-month period, providing a quarterly snapshot of market conditions.

Related Trends

74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

ALLQ74B3TSNR

76) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Consumer Abs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

ALLQ76DSNR

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

ALLQ51DDSNR

42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Fx Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably

ALLQ42BICNR

19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ19A52MINR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: First in Importance

ALLQ37B3MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, 51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably [ALLQ51BICNR], retrieved from FRED.

Last Checked: 8/1/2025