51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ51DDSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
2.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for credit referencing corporates. Provides insights into corporate credit market dynamics and dispute resolution trends.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator measures shifts in corporate credit contract disputes over quarterly periods. It helps analysts understand credit market friction and contractual complexity.
Methodology
Data collected through survey-based reporting from financial institutions and credit markets.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess corporate credit market stability.
Key Facts
- Quarterly tracking of corporate credit disputes
- Indicates market contract complexity
- Reflects financial sector negotiation trends
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks changes in duration and persistence of credit referencing corporate contract disputes over three months.
Q: Why are corporate credit dispute trends important?
A: They reveal potential friction in credit markets and contractual negotiation dynamics.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Quarterly updates provide current insights into corporate credit market conditions.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Financial analysts, regulators, and corporate finance professionals monitor these trends.
Q: What does a decrease in dispute duration indicate?
A: Potentially smoother contract negotiations and improved market efficiency.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading Reits. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ40CDCNR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ50BRBUNR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ06B73MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ66A3ECNR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ52A2RBUNR
9) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Availability of Additional (and Currently Unutilized) Financial Leverage Under Agreements Currently in Place with Hedge Funds (for Example, Under Prime Broker, Warehouse Agreements, and Other Committed but Undrawn or Partly Drawn Facilities) Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ09ISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Credit Referencing Corporates Dispute Duration (ALLQ51DDSNR), retrieved from FRED.