40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ40BDSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral dispute duration with hedge fund clients. Provides insights into financial service relationship dynamics and risk management.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures shifts in dispute characteristics between financial institutions and hedge fund clients over quarterly periods.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses from financial institutions about client interactions.
Historical Context
Used to assess financial sector risk and counterparty relationship stability.
Key Facts
- Quarterly tracking of dispute characteristics
- Focuses specifically on hedge fund client interactions
- Indicates potential financial sector tension
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: It tracks changes in mark and collateral dispute duration with hedge fund clients over three-month periods.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: They can indicate potential risks and relationship tensions in financial services.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: The series is typically updated on a quarterly basis.
Q: What does 'decreased somewhat' indicate?
A: It suggests a reduction in dispute complexity or duration with hedge fund clients.
Q: Who uses this data?
A: Risk managers, financial analysts, and institutional researchers monitor these trends.
Related Trends
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ66A1RBUNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ21DDSNR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
SFQ79EISNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ39AICNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ37A4MINR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ62B3ECNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (CTQ40BDSNR), retrieved from FRED.