39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably

CTQ39AICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

1.00

Year-over-Year Change

0.00%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025

Summary

Tracks changes in mark and collateral dispute volumes with financial intermediaries. Provides insight into financial market friction and institutional relationship dynamics.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This trend measures dispute intensity between financial institutions and their clients. It reflects potential stress or communication challenges in financial transactions.

Methodology

Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking dispute volume changes.

Historical Context

Used by regulators and risk managers to assess financial market operational health.

Key Facts

  • Indicates financial market transaction complexity
  • Reflects potential institutional communication challenges
  • Important metric for risk assessment

FAQs

Q: What does this economic indicator measure?

A: Tracks volume changes in mark and collateral disputes with financial intermediaries. Provides insight into market transaction dynamics.

Q: Why are mark and collateral disputes important?

A: They reveal potential friction and communication challenges in financial transactions between institutions.

Q: How frequently is this data updated?

A: Typically collected and reported on a quarterly basis by financial regulators.

Q: Who uses this economic data?

A: Risk managers, financial regulators, and institutional investors analyze these trends.

Q: What does an increase in disputes indicate?

A: Potential increased market complexity or communication challenges between financial entities.

Related News

Related Trends

62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

SFQ62B2TSNR

35) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Nonfinancial Corporations as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Considerably

CTQ35TCNR

6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

ALLQ06B73MINR

39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

CTQ39BDCNR

47) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Commodity Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

OTCDQ47ADCNR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ37A42MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (CTQ39AICNR), retrieved from FRED.
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably | US Economic Trends