79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
SFQ79EISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in lending dispute duration for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities. Provides insights into financial market lending conditions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks quarterly shifts in mark and collateral dispute persistence for non-agency RMBS. Indicates potential market friction and lending environment complexity.
Methodology
Calculated through quarterly survey of financial market participants.
Historical Context
Used by investors and regulators to assess lending market dynamics.
Key Facts
- Focuses on non-agency RMBS dispute changes
- Quarterly tracking of dispute persistence
- Indicates potential lending market tensions
FAQs
Q: What are non-agency RMBS?
A: Residential mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises.
Q: Why track lending dispute changes?
A: Disputes can indicate market stress and potential lending environment challenges.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Data is collected and updated on a quarterly basis.
Q: What does 'increased somewhat' mean?
A: Indicates a moderate rise in dispute duration or complexity compared to previous quarters.
Q: Who uses this data?
A: Investors, regulators, and financial market analysts use this information for risk assessment.
Related Trends
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ70A1ESNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ74B1ECNR
53) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
SFQ53ICNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ25B62MINR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ37A13MINR
60) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Equities Are Funded (Including Through Stock Loan) Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ60A2ESNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Lending Dispute Changes (SFQ79EISNR), retrieved from FRED.