51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

ALLQ51CISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

2.00

Year-over-Year Change

100.00%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes specifically related to equity contracts over a three-month period. The trend provides insights into potential friction and complexity within financial market transactions.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

The metric reflects the evolving landscape of contractual disputes in equity markets, potentially signaling underlying tensions or challenges in financial agreements. Economists use such indicators to assess market efficiency, contractual risk, and potential systemic pressures.

Methodology

Data is likely collected through surveys of financial institutions, legal professionals, and market participants tracking the characteristics of equity contract disputes.

Historical Context

This trend is used by regulators, financial analysts, and policymakers to understand potential risks and inefficiencies in equity market transactions.

Key Facts

  • Indicates increased complexity in equity contract disputes
  • Reflects potential market friction in financial transactions
  • Provides insight into contractual risk and market dynamics

FAQs

Q: What does this trend measure?

A: It tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes in equity contracts over three months.

Q: Why are equity contract disputes important?

A: These disputes can signal potential inefficiencies, risks, or challenges in financial market transactions and contractual agreements.

Q: How is this data collected?

A: The data is typically gathered through surveys of financial institutions, legal professionals, and market participants tracking contract dispute characteristics.

Q: Who uses this economic indicator?

A: Regulators, financial analysts, policymakers, and market researchers use this trend to assess market conditions and potential systemic risks.

Q: What are the limitations of this indicator?

A: The data represents a snapshot of a specific period and may not capture long-term trends or comprehensive market dynamics.

Related News

Related Trends

7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably

ALLQ07ICNR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ37A72MINR

74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

ALLQ74B3ESNR

40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

CTQ40EDCNR

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

CTQ31A33MINR

79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ79EDCNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, 51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat [ALLQ51CISNR], retrieved from FRED.

Last Checked: 8/1/2025

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat | US Economic Trends