68) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Non-Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ68DSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in client demand for term funding beyond 30-day maturities in non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities. Provides insight into lending market dynamics and institutional investment strategies.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend measures shifts in institutional lending appetite for specific financial instruments. It reflects broader market sentiment and credit market conditions.
Methodology
Surveyed financial institutions report quarterly changes in funding demand.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to assess credit market liquidity and risk appetite.
Key Facts
- Quarterly survey-based metric
- Focuses on non-agency RMBS funding
- Indicates credit market sentiment
FAQs
Q: What does this trend indicate about lending markets?
A: It shows changes in institutional demand for specific types of term funding. Reflects broader credit market conditions.
Q: How often is this data collected?
A: The data is collected quarterly through institutional surveys.
Q: Why are non-agency RMBS important?
A: They represent private-market mortgage securities outside government-sponsored enterprises.
Q: How do investors use this data?
A: To assess market liquidity and potential shifts in lending strategies.
Q: What are the limitations of this trend?
A: Represents survey responses, not actual transaction volumes.
Related Trends
61) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Equities (Including Through Stock Loan) by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ61DSNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ74A1RBUNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ62A1TCNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ70A2TSNR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ22ICNR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading REITs Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ13B53MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Term Funding Demand (ALLQ68DSNR), retrieved from FRED.