Number of Respondents, Quarterly, Not Seasonally Adjusted

CTQ06A1SINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

3.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

7/1/2011 - 10/1/2011

Summary

Tracks quarterly survey respondent count for specific economic research. Provides critical insight into data collection and statistical sampling methodology.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This metric represents the total number of participants in a quarterly economic survey. It helps researchers assess data reliability and representativeness.

Methodology

Calculated by counting unique survey participants during each quarterly reporting period.

Historical Context

Used by economists to validate statistical significance of survey-based economic research.

Key Facts

  • Quarterly tracking of survey participation
  • Indicates research sample composition
  • Critical for statistical validity

FAQs

Q: What does this series measure?

A: Tracks the number of participants in a specific quarterly economic survey. Helps assess data collection quality.

Q: Why is respondent count important?

A: Larger sample sizes increase statistical reliability and research accuracy. Helps validate economic findings.

Q: How often is this data updated?

A: Updated quarterly with non-seasonally adjusted figures.

Q: Can sample size affect economic research?

A: Yes, sample size directly impacts the statistical significance and generalizability of economic research.

Q: Are there limitations to this data?

A: Sample composition and response rates can introduce potential biases in economic surveys.

Related News

Related Trends

19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ19A62MINR

40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

CTQ40DDSNR

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including MBS and ABS. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

OTCDQ51EISNR

19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ19B22MINR

44) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Equity Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ44ARBUNR

53) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ53RBUNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Number of Respondents Quarterly (CTQ06A1SINR), retrieved from FRED.