51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ51DDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in credit contract dispute resolution for corporate referencing. Provides insights into financial contract management practices.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks duration and persistence of credit contract disputes in corporate referencing. Indicates efficiency of contract resolution mechanisms.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection tracking corporate credit contract dispute trends.
Historical Context
Used by legal and financial professionals to assess contract management effectiveness.
Key Facts
- Reflects corporate contract dispute trends
- Indicates contract management efficiency
- Important for understanding legal risk
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks changes in duration and persistence of credit contract disputes for corporate referencing. Provides insights into contract resolution.
Q: Why are contract disputes important?
A: They can indicate market friction, legal complexity, and potential financial risks in corporate lending.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically collected quarterly through financial and legal sector surveys.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Legal professionals, financial analysts, and corporate risk managers use it to understand contract management trends.
Q: What do changes in this indicator suggest?
A: Shifts can reveal evolving corporate contract practices and potential market challenges.
Related Trends
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ40DDSNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ39BDCNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ25B53MINR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading Reits Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ13A42MINR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ52A3TSNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ40ARBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Credit Contract Disputes (ALLQ51DDCNR), retrieved from FRED.