51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ51DRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

12.00

Year-over-Year Change

0.00%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for corporate credit contracts. Provides insight into financial market stability and contractual dispute resolution trends.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This economic indicator measures the duration and persistence of contractual disputes in corporate credit markets. It helps assess financial sector friction and contract management.

Methodology

Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking contract dispute characteristics.

Historical Context

Used by regulators and financial analysts to monitor market transaction smoothness.

Key Facts

  • Indicates stability in corporate credit contract disputes
  • Reflects market transaction complexity
  • Important for financial risk assessment

FAQs

Q: What does this economic indicator measure?

A: Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes in corporate credit contracts.

Q: Why are corporate contract disputes important?

A: They reveal potential friction in financial markets and contract management effectiveness.

Q: How often is this data updated?

A: Typically collected and reported on a quarterly basis by financial institutions.

Q: Who uses this economic data?

A: Regulators, financial analysts, and risk management professionals monitor these trends.

Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' indicate?

A: Suggests stable contract dispute conditions in corporate credit markets.

Related News

Related Trends

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: First in Importance

ALLQ31A1MINR

70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

ALLQ70B1ESNR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ37B32MINR

74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably

ALLQ74A1ECNR

75) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Consumer Abs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

ALLQ75DSNR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ37B62MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Credit Contract Disputes (ALLQ51DRBUNR), retrieved from FRED.
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged | US Economic Trends