38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ38DCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in negotiation intensity for nonfinancial corporations' pricing and terms. Indicates potential shifts in corporate procurement and strategic approaches.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks how aggressively nonfinancial corporations pursue price and contract negotiations. It reflects broader economic negotiation dynamics.
Methodology
Quarterly survey capturing corporate negotiation strategy changes.
Historical Context
Used to assess corporate procurement and strategic purchasing trends.
Key Facts
- Quarterly corporate negotiation assessment
- Tracks pricing and nonprice term changes
- Indicates corporate strategic shifts
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It measures changes in negotiation intensity for nonfinancial corporations' pricing and contract terms.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: The data is collected and updated on a quarterly basis.
Q: Why are corporate negotiations important?
A: They reflect broader economic conditions and corporate strategic approaches.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Economists, business strategists, and corporate procurement professionals.
Q: What are the data's potential limitations?
A: Survey-based data may not capture all nuanced negotiation dynamics.
Related Trends
73) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the CMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Considerably
SFQ73PNNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ31B43MINR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ70B4RBUNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ51BISNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ40DRBUNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ40DDCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Negotiation Intensity (ALLQ38DCNR), retrieved from FRED.