51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ51BISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for interest rate contracts. Provides insights into financial market friction and contract resolution complexity.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures shifts in dispute characteristics for interest rate-related financial contracts. It helps economists understand market stress and contractual negotiation dynamics.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking dispute characteristics.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess market stability and contract management trends.
Key Facts
- Measures dispute duration in interest rate contracts
- Indicates potential market stress indicators
- Quarterly survey-based metric
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for interest rate contracts.
Q: Why are interest rate contract disputes important?
A: They can signal market tensions and potential systemic financial risks.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically collected and reported on a quarterly basis.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Financial regulators, market analysts, and risk management professionals.
Q: What does an increase in disputes indicate?
A: Potential increased market complexity or contractual disagreements in interest rate markets.
Related Trends
73) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Cmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Somewhat
ALLQ73MONR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ74B2TCNR
76) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ76RBUNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ62A1ESNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ25B62MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66A3ESNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Interest Rate Contract Disputes (ALLQ51BISNR), retrieved from FRED.