40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ40DRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
17.00
Year-over-Year Change
-10.53%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Examines duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments. Provides insights into institutional financial interactions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend measures dispute characteristics in institutional investment settings. It helps understand stability of financial service relationships.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection tracking dispute duration and persistence.
Historical Context
Used by financial regulators to monitor institutional investment dispute patterns.
Key Facts
- Tracks disputes in institutional investment settings
- Measures dispute duration and persistence
- Covers mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans
FAQs
Q: What institutions are covered in this series?
A: Includes mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments.
Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' indicate?
A: Suggests stable dispute characteristics with minimal variation from previous periods.
Q: Why track dispute duration?
A: Helps assess the complexity and resolution efficiency of financial service interactions.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: The series provides quarterly updates on dispute characteristics.
Q: Who might use this economic indicator?
A: Financial regulators, investment managers, and policy researchers analyze these trends.
Related Trends
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ56B1ECNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ19B1MINR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. CMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ79FDCNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ74A1ESNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ56A4RBUNR
20) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ20DCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ40DRBUNR), retrieved from FRED.