20) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ20DCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in negotiation intensity for investment fund pricing and terms. Provides insights into institutional investment market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks how mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments adjust their investment negotiation strategies.
Methodology
Collected through periodic surveys of institutional investment professionals.
Historical Context
Used to understand shifts in institutional investment market behavior.
Key Facts
- Reflects institutional investment market trends
- Indicates changes in negotiation strategies
- Important for understanding market dynamics
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Changes in negotiation intensity for investment fund pricing and non-price terms.
Q: Why is this data important?
A: Provides insights into institutional investment market behavior and strategies.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Typically surveyed quarterly to capture market trend changes.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Financial analysts, investors, and market researchers track these trends.
Q: What does a decrease in negotiation intensity mean?
A: Could indicate reduced market activity or changes in investment strategies.
Related Trends
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ62B1ECNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ37B43MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ66A1TSNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ51DRBUNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ62B4ECNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ56B2TCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Investment Negotiation Intensity (ALLQ20DCNR), retrieved from FRED.