20) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ20DCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in negotiation intensity for investment fund pricing and terms. Provides insights into institutional investment market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks how mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments adjust their investment negotiation strategies.
Methodology
Collected through periodic surveys of institutional investment professionals.
Historical Context
Used to understand shifts in institutional investment market behavior.
Key Facts
- Reflects institutional investment market trends
- Indicates changes in negotiation strategies
- Important for understanding market dynamics
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Changes in negotiation intensity for investment fund pricing and non-price terms.
Q: Why is this data important?
A: Provides insights into institutional investment market behavior and strategies.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Typically surveyed quarterly to capture market trend changes.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Financial analysts, investors, and market researchers track these trends.
Q: What does a decrease in negotiation intensity mean?
A: Could indicate reduced market activity or changes in investment strategies.
Related Trends
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ40AICNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ39FDCNR
24) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Insurance Companies Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ24RBUNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ31A53MINR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ39EDSNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ56B2ESNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Investment Negotiation Intensity (ALLQ20DCNR), retrieved from FRED.