66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ66A1TSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in maximum funding amounts for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities. Provides critical insights into lending market capacity and risk appetite.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks how financial institutions are adjusting maximum funding levels for mortgage-backed securities. It reflects credit market constraints.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly surveys of financial lending institutions.
Historical Context
Critical for understanding mortgage market lending capacity and risk management.
Key Facts
- Indicates funding amount restrictions
- Quarterly updated metric
- Signals credit market risk perception
FAQs
Q: What does this economic series track?
A: It measures changes in maximum funding amounts for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities.
Q: Why are funding amount changes significant?
A: They reveal lending institutions' risk tolerance and overall credit market conditions.
Q: How frequently is the data updated?
A: The series is updated on a quarterly basis through financial institution surveys.
Q: Who monitors these funding term changes?
A: Financial analysts, investors, and regulatory bodies track these indicators.
Q: What does 'tightened somewhat' mean?
A: Suggests slightly more conservative approach to maximum funding amounts.
Related Trends
67) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Non-Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ67ISNR
33) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ33RBUNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ25B13MINR
8) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Hedge Funds Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ08RBUNR
54) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ54RBUNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ25B63MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Funding Terms (SFQ66A1TSNR), retrieved from FRED.