69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Considerably
SFQ69PNNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures improvements in non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) market liquidity. Provides critical insights into mortgage market functioning.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks changes in liquidity and market performance for non-agency RMBS. Reflects broader mortgage market health and investor sentiment.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial market participants tracking RMBS market conditions.
Historical Context
Used by investors and regulators to assess mortgage market stability.
Key Facts
- Quarterly market liquidity assessment
- Focuses on non-agency residential mortgages
- Indicates investor confidence
FAQs
Q: What does this non-agency RMBS indicator measure?
A: It tracks improvements in liquidity and functioning of non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities markets.
Q: Why are non-agency RMBS important?
A: They represent mortgage securities not backed by government-sponsored enterprises, indicating private market health.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: The survey is conducted quarterly to provide current market insights.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Investors, mortgage professionals, and financial regulators monitor these trends.
Q: What does 'Improved Considerably' signify?
A: Indicates significant enhancement in market liquidity and trading conditions for non-agency RMBS.
Related News

Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...

S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...

U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...

U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...

U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...

U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
26) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Insurance Companies to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ26ISNR
54) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ54ICNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ37A3MINR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31B42MINR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ74B3RBUNR
63) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ63ISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Market (SFQ69PNNR), retrieved from FRED.