51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ51BDSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for interest rate contracts. Provides insights into financial market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures shifts in contractual dispute resolution for interest rate-related agreements. Indicates potential market friction or improvement.
Methodology
Collected through survey of financial market participants.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess market efficiency.
Key Facts
- Reflects financial market contract dynamics
- Indicates potential market friction
- Important for regulatory assessment
FAQs
Q: What are mark and collateral disputes?
A: Disagreements about contract valuation and collateral terms in financial agreements.
Q: Why track these disputes?
A: They provide insights into market efficiency and potential financial tensions.
Q: How frequently are these tracked?
A: Typically measured quarterly to capture recent market trends.
Q: What impacts these disputes?
A: Market volatility, regulatory changes, and financial instrument complexity.
Q: Do these disputes matter for investors?
A: They can indicate market health and potential systemic financial risks.
Related Trends
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ37B4MINR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ62A4ECNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading Reits. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ39CDCNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ37A4MINR
76) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
SFQ76ICNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ25B52MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Interest Rate Contract Disputes (ALLQ51BDSNR), retrieved from FRED.