38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ38DSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in negotiation intensity for nonfinancial corporations' pricing and terms. Provides insights into corporate strategy and market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks how corporations adjust their negotiation approaches for pricing and contract terms. Reflects competitive business landscape.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses from corporate decision-makers.
Historical Context
Used to understand corporate behavior and market competitive conditions.
Key Facts
- Indicates corporate negotiation trends
- Reflects competitive business environment
- Provides insights into pricing strategies
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator track?
A: Changes in nonfinancial corporations' negotiation intensity for pricing and contract terms.
Q: Why are corporate negotiation trends important?
A: They reveal competitive dynamics and strategic approaches in business markets.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: Through surveys of corporate decision-makers about their negotiation strategies.
Q: Who finds this data useful?
A: Economists, investors, and business strategists analyzing market competition.
Q: What are the data's potential limitations?
A: Relies on subjective survey responses and may not capture all market nuances.
Related Trends
60) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Equities Are Funded (Including Through Stock Loan) Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ60B4RBUNR
11) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Trading REITs as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
CTQ11TSNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ66A2ECNR
54) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
SFQ54ICNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ62B1ECNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ21DDCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Negotiation Intensity (ALLQ38DSNR), retrieved from FRED.