38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

ALLQ38DSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

Measures changes in negotiation intensity for nonfinancial corporations' pricing and terms. Provides insights into corporate strategy and market dynamics.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

Tracks how corporations adjust their negotiation approaches for pricing and contract terms. Reflects competitive business landscape.

Methodology

Collected through survey responses from corporate decision-makers.

Historical Context

Used to understand corporate behavior and market competitive conditions.

Key Facts

  • Indicates corporate negotiation trends
  • Reflects competitive business environment
  • Provides insights into pricing strategies

FAQs

Q: What does this economic indicator track?

A: Changes in nonfinancial corporations' negotiation intensity for pricing and contract terms.

Q: Why are corporate negotiation trends important?

A: They reveal competitive dynamics and strategic approaches in business markets.

Q: How is this data collected?

A: Through surveys of corporate decision-makers about their negotiation strategies.

Q: Who finds this data useful?

A: Economists, investors, and business strategists analyzing market competition.

Q: What are the data's potential limitations?

A: Relies on subjective survey responses and may not capture all market nuances.

Related News

Related Trends

43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

OTCDQ43ARBUNR

18) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Considerably

ALLQ18ECNR

62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably

SFQ62A2ECNR

39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably

CTQ39GICNR

70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

ALLQ70B3TSNR

79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

ALLQ79EISNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Negotiation Intensity (ALLQ38DSNR), retrieved from FRED.