69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Somewhat
SFQ69MONR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks liquidity and functioning in the non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) market. Provides insights into market conditions and financial sector health.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures changes in market dynamics for non-agency RMBS. It helps investors and analysts understand market sentiment and potential investment opportunities.
Methodology
Surveyed data collected from financial market participants over three-month periods.
Historical Context
Used by investors and regulators to assess mortgage market stability and credit conditions.
Key Facts
- Tracks non-agency RMBS market conditions
- Quarterly assessment of market functioning
- Important indicator for financial sector health
FAQs
Q: What are non-agency RMBS?
A: Residential mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Q: Why is market liquidity important?
A: Liquidity indicates market health, ease of trading, and investor confidence in specific securities.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly based on market participant surveys.
Q: Who uses this market indicator?
A: Investors, financial analysts, and regulatory bodies track this metric for market insights.
Q: What does 'improved somewhat' mean?
A: Indicates a modest positive change in market conditions over the three-month period.
Related Trends
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ22ISNR
71) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Cmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ71RBUNR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ43ADSNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ21DRBUNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ70A3TSNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ39ADSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Market Liquidity (SFQ69MONR), retrieved from FRED.