66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ66A2RBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
16.00
Year-over-Year Change
6.67%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Monitors maximum maturity terms for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Provides critical insights into lending and investment horizons.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks changes in maximum maturity for non-agency RMBS. It reflects lending strategies and market risk appetite.
Methodology
Collected through surveys of financial institutions reporting funding term changes.
Historical Context
Used by investors to understand mortgage securities market dynamics.
Key Facts
- Indicates stability in RMBS maturity terms
- Reflects lending market conditions
- Important for mortgage securities investors
FAQs
Q: What does maximum maturity mean in RMBS?
A: Maximum maturity represents the longest possible term for mortgage-backed securities funding.
Q: Why track maximum maturity?
A: It provides insights into lending strategies and market risk tolerance.
Q: How frequently are these terms assessed?
A: Typically reviewed quarterly to monitor market funding conditions.
Q: Who monitors these maturity terms?
A: Investors, financial analysts, and regulatory bodies track these metrics.
Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' indicate?
A: Suggests consistent lending terms and stable market conditions over three months.
Related Trends
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. Cmbs. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ79FISNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including Mbs and Abs. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ51EDCNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ40DISNR
33) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ33ICNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ19B3MINR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ40AISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Funding Terms (SFQ66A2RBUNR), retrieved from FRED.