32) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Investment Advisers to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms on Behalf of Separately Managed Accounts Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ32ISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
2.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks investment adviser negotiation intensity for separately managed accounts. Provides insight into financial service sector dynamics and client relationship strategies.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures changes in investment advisers' efforts to secure more favorable terms for client accounts. Reflects competitive landscape of financial advisory services.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions and investment advisory firms.
Historical Context
Used by financial regulators and institutional investors to assess market negotiation trends.
Key Facts
- Reflects quarterly changes in negotiation strategies
- Indicates financial service sector adaptability
- Measures institutional relationship dynamics
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks investment advisers' efforts to negotiate more favorable terms for separately managed accounts.
Q: Why are these negotiation trends important?
A: Provides insights into financial service competitiveness and client relationship management strategies.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Collected and reported on a quarterly basis by financial institutions.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Financial regulators, institutional investors, and market analysts study these trends.
Q: What limitations exist in this data?
A: Represents survey-based perceptions and may not capture entire market dynamics.
Related Trends
7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ07RBUNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ51DDCNR
47) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Commodity Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ47ADCNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ39GRBUNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ19B73MINR
75) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Consumer Abs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ75ICNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Investment Adviser Negotiation Intensity (ALLQ32ISNR), retrieved from FRED.