51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ51FDSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in commodity contract dispute duration and persistence. Provides insights into market friction and contractual complexity in commodity trading.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures shifts in dispute characteristics for commodity contracts over a three-month period. Helps assess market transaction efficiency and potential regulatory challenges.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions and market participants.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and traders to understand commodity market transaction dynamics.
Key Facts
- Tracks three-month dispute changes
- Focuses on commodity contract interactions
- Indicates market transaction complexity
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Measures changes in commodity contract dispute duration and persistence over three months.
Q: Why are commodity contract disputes important?
A: They reveal potential inefficiencies and transaction challenges in commodity markets.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly based on market participant surveys.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Regulators, traders, and market analysts use it to assess commodity market dynamics.
Q: What does a decrease in disputes indicate?
A: Suggests improving market efficiency and clearer contractual terms.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ25B33MINR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ79EDCNR
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Somewhat
SFQ69MONR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ25A22MINR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ43BDCNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| C. Pension Plans. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ21CICNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Commodity Contract Disputes (OTCDQ51FDSNR), retrieved from FRED.