51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ51BISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for interest rate contracts. Provides critical insights into financial market volatility and negotiation complexity.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator tracks quarterly shifts in interest rate contract dispute characteristics. It helps economists understand financial market transaction dynamics.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking interest rate contract disputes.
Historical Context
Utilized by central banks and financial regulators to assess market stability.
Key Facts
- Quarterly tracking of interest rate contract disputes
- Reflects financial market negotiation complexity
- Indicates potential market friction levels
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator reveal?
A: Tracks changes in duration and persistence of interest rate contract disputes over three months.
Q: Why are interest rate dispute trends significant?
A: They provide insights into financial market negotiation complexity and potential volatility.
Q: How often is this data refreshed?
A: Quarterly updates offer current perspectives on interest rate market conditions.
Q: Who monitors these dispute trends?
A: Central banks, financial regulators, and market analysts use this data for assessment.
Q: What does an increase in dispute duration suggest?
A: Potential increased complexity or friction in interest rate contract negotiations.
Related Trends
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ25A13MINR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| C. Pension Plans. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ21CDSNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ56A3TCNR
10) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Hedge Funds Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ10DCNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Fx. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ51AISNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including Mbs and Abs. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ51EICNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Interest Rate Contract Disputes (OTCDQ51BISNR), retrieved from FRED.