50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ50BDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
This economic indicator tracks changes in the volume of mark and collateral disputes related to interest rate contracts over a three-month period. The trend provides insights into financial market tensions and potential risks in interest rate-based financial instruments.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The metric reflects the frequency and intensity of disputes in interest rate contract settlements, which can signal underlying market stress or contractual complexity. Economists use this data to assess financial market friction and potential systemic risks.
Methodology
Data is collected through systematic reporting from financial institutions and aggregated by the Federal Reserve to track dispute volumes in specific contract types.
Historical Context
This indicator is used in macroeconomic analysis to understand financial market dynamics, regulatory compliance, and potential areas of financial system vulnerability.
Key Facts
- Tracks volume of disputes in interest rate contracts over three months
- Provides insight into potential financial market stress
- Helps identify emerging risks in financial instrument settlements
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It measures the volume of mark and collateral disputes specifically related to interest rate contracts over a three-month period.
Q: Why are these dispute volumes important?
A: Dispute volumes can indicate potential market tensions, contractual complexities, and underlying risks in financial transactions.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: The data is gathered through systematic reporting from financial institutions and compiled by the Federal Reserve.
Q: How do policymakers use this information?
A: Policymakers use this data to assess financial market health, identify potential systemic risks, and inform regulatory strategies.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: The data typically reflects changes over a three-month period, providing a quarterly snapshot of market conditions.
Related Trends
34) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Investment Advisers Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ34RBUNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ25B32MINR
23) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Insurance Companies as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
CTQ23TSNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37A62MINR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ43BDSNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ37B43MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably [OTCDQ50BDCNR], retrieved from FRED.
Last Checked: 8/1/2025