51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ51DICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for corporate credit contracts. Provides insight into financial market contract resolution complexities.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator measures shifts in corporate credit contract dispute characteristics. It reflects potential tensions in financial market interactions.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking contract dispute trends.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess market contract stability.
Key Facts
- Indicates corporate credit market dispute intensity
- Reflects potential financial market friction
- Valuable for risk assessment
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks changes in duration and persistence of corporate credit contract disputes over three months.
Q: Why are contract dispute metrics important?
A: They reveal potential friction and resolution challenges in financial markets.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically collected and reported on a quarterly basis by financial institutions.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, and risk management professionals monitor these trends.
Q: What does an increase in dispute duration indicate?
A: Potential growing complexity or challenges in corporate credit contract negotiations.
Related Trends
7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ07ICNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ56B4ESNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ25A12MINR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ25A42MINR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ70A3TSNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ56A2ESNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Credit Referencing Corporates Dispute Duration (ALLQ51DICNR), retrieved from FRED.