51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ51DICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for corporate credit contracts. Provides insight into financial market contract resolution complexities.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator measures shifts in corporate credit contract dispute characteristics. It reflects potential tensions in financial market interactions.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking contract dispute trends.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess market contract stability.
Key Facts
- Indicates corporate credit market dispute intensity
- Reflects potential financial market friction
- Valuable for risk assessment
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks changes in duration and persistence of corporate credit contract disputes over three months.
Q: Why are contract dispute metrics important?
A: They reveal potential friction and resolution challenges in financial markets.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically collected and reported on a quarterly basis by financial institutions.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, and risk management professionals monitor these trends.
Q: What does an increase in dispute duration indicate?
A: Potential growing complexity or challenges in corporate credit contract negotiations.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
10) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Hedge Funds Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ10ICNR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ50DISNR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading REITs Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ13A22MINR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ51DDSNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37B12MINR
32) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Investment Advisers to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms on Behalf of Separately Managed Accounts Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ32DSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Credit Referencing Corporates Dispute Duration (ALLQ51DICNR), retrieved from FRED.