40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading REITs. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ40CDSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes specifically for Trading REITs. Provides insights into client relationship dynamics in real estate investment markets.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend measures dispute characteristics between Trading REITs and their clients. It helps assess relationship quality and potential financial friction points.
Methodology
Data collected through surveying Trading REIT client interaction metrics.
Historical Context
Used by financial regulators and investment risk managers to monitor market interactions.
Key Facts
- Tracks client dispute trends in REIT sector
- Indicates potential relationship friction points
- Valuable for risk assessment metrics
FAQs
Q: What does CTQ40CDSNR measure?
A: It tracks changes in dispute duration and persistence for Trading REITs with their clients.
Q: Why are REIT client disputes important?
A: They can indicate potential financial risks and relationship quality in real estate investments.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly to reflect recent market interactions.
Q: Who uses this data?
A: Financial analysts, regulators, and investment risk managers monitor these trends.
Q: What does 'Decreased Somewhat' mean?
A: Indicates a moderate reduction in dispute intensity or duration.
Related Trends
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ37A23MINR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ50FRBUNR
68) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Non-Agency RMBS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
SFQ68ISNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ74A4TSNR
41) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Nonprice Terms Incorporated in New or Renegotiated OTC Derivatives Master Agreements Put in Place with Your Institution's Clients Changed?| D. Triggers and Covenants. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
OTCDQ41DTCNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ74B2ECNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Trading REIT Client Disputes (CTQ40CDSNR), retrieved from FRED.