50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ50FRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
12.00
Year-over-Year Change
9.09%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in commodity contract dispute volumes over three-month periods. Provides insight into market transaction complexity and potential contractual tensions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures dispute frequency in commodity market contracts. It helps economists understand transactional friction and market stability.
Methodology
Data collected through survey of financial market participants and institutions.
Historical Context
Used by regulators to assess commodity market transaction dynamics and potential risks.
Key Facts
- Indicates stability of commodity contract negotiations
- Reflects potential market transaction challenges
- Provides quarterly market interaction insights
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks volume changes in commodity contract disputes over three-month periods. Helps assess market transaction complexity.
Q: Why are commodity contract disputes important?
A: They reveal potential friction in market transactions and underlying economic relationships.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically updated on a quarterly basis by surveying market participants.
Q: Can this indicator predict market trends?
A: Provides insights into market stability and potential transactional challenges.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Regulators, economists, and financial analysts study this metric for market insights.
Related Trends
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ50BRBUNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ51FDCNR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ22RBUNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ74B1RBUNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ39DDSNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ37A7MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Commodity Contract Disputes (OTCDQ50FRBUNR), retrieved from FRED.