40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ40BISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
2.00
Year-over-Year Change
-50.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes with hedge funds. Provides insights into financial market risk and institutional client relationships.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric evaluates the evolution of dispute duration and persistence specifically for hedge fund interactions. It helps assess financial market friction and counterparty risk.
Methodology
Data collected through institutional survey of financial market participants.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and risk managers to monitor financial market stability.
Key Facts
- Tracks hedge fund dispute characteristics
- Indicates market relationship complexity
- Measures institutional risk perception
FAQs
Q: What does this metric measure?
A: Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes with hedge funds over three months.
Q: Why are hedge fund disputes important?
A: They indicate potential market friction and counterparty risk in financial transactions.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically collected and reported on a quarterly basis by financial institutions.
Q: Who uses this data?
A: Risk managers, regulators, and financial analysts monitoring market interactions.
Q: What does 'increased somewhat' indicate?
A: Suggests a moderate rise in dispute complexity or frequency with hedge fund clients.
Related Trends
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ19B22MINR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ56A3TSNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ74B2TCNR
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency Rmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Considerably
ALLQ69PNNR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ43BDCNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ40DISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (CTQ40BISNR), retrieved from FRED.