40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ40DISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
2.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments. Provides critical financial sector insights.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator tracks dispute characteristics in institutional investment settings. It helps understand complexity and resolution patterns in financial relationships.
Methodology
Quarterly survey collecting data on dispute duration from financial institutions.
Historical Context
Used by policymakers and financial researchers to assess institutional investment climate.
Key Facts
- Tracks dispute duration in institutional investments
- Covers mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans
- Quarterly measurement of dispute persistence
FAQs
Q: What types of institutions are included in this data?
A: Mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments are tracked in this economic indicator.
Q: What does 'increased somewhat' mean?
A: Indicates a moderate rise in dispute duration and persistence compared to previous periods.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: Through quarterly surveys of financial institutions tracking dispute characteristics.
Q: Why monitor dispute duration?
A: Helps understand potential friction and resolution challenges in institutional investment relationships.
Q: What might cause increased dispute persistence?
A: Complex financial instruments, market volatility, or changing regulatory environments.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ40FISNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ39ARBUNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ66A4ESNR
24) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Insurance Companies Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ24RBUNR
45) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Credit Derivatives Referencing Corporates (Single-Name Corporates or Corporate Indexes) Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ45ADCNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ62B4ECNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (CTQ40DISNR), retrieved from FRED.