19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ19B4MINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
1/1/2012 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks internal treasury funding charges for mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments. Provides insight into institutional financial market conditions and funding dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric examines changes in funding costs and internal treasury charges for institutional investment vehicles. It reflects broader financial market liquidity and funding conditions.
Methodology
Data collected through survey responses from financial institutions and market participants.
Historical Context
Used by policymakers and investors to assess institutional funding environment.
Key Facts
- Tracks quarterly changes in funding charges
- Covers multiple investment vehicle types
- Indicates financial market liquidity conditions
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It measures internal treasury funding charges for institutional investment vehicles across different financial sectors.
Q: Why are internal treasury charges important?
A: They reflect broader financial market liquidity and potential changes in institutional funding costs.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly based on survey responses from financial institutions.
Q: What institutions are included in this metric?
A: Mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments are covered in this analysis.
Q: How can investors use this information?
A: To understand potential shifts in institutional funding environments and investment costs.
Related News
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Home Sales Decline In August Due To High Prices
August 2023 U.S. Home Sales Decline Amid Rising Mortgage Rates and High Prices In August 2023, U.S. home sales experienced a notable decline, highl...
U.S. Trade Deficit Decreases As Businesses Anticipate Tariff Hikes
U.S. Trade Deficit Reaches Two-Year Low Amid Anticipated Tariff Hikes The recent announcement that the U.S. trade deficit has reached a two-year lo...
U.S. Natural Gas Storage Increases Due to Market Dynamics
Navigating Market Volatility: U.S. Natural Gas Storage Strategies and Trends Understanding the dynamics of the U.S. natural gas storage sector is c...
U.S. GDP Growth to Slow Due to Tariffs and Immigration Policies
How Tariffs and Immigration Policies Influence U.S. GDP Growth in 2025 The U.S. GDP is a fundamental gauge of the country's economic health. Recent...
Related Trends
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ56A3ECNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ51DDSNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ25A42MINR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ56A3TSNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ66A1RBUNR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ52A4ECNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Internal Treasury Charges (CTQ19B4MINR), retrieved from FRED.