39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

CTQ39DDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

-100.00%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025

Summary

Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for institutional investment clients over three-month periods. Provides insight into financial service sector dispute dynamics.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This metric measures dispute volume for mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments. Indicates potential friction in financial transactions and client relationships.

Methodology

Collected through financial service industry surveys and reporting mechanisms.

Historical Context

Used by regulators and financial institutions to assess market interaction quality.

Key Facts

  • Tracks institutional investment client disputes
  • Covers mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans
  • Quarterly reporting mechanism

FAQs

Q: What does this series measure?

A: Tracks volume of mark and collateral disputes for institutional investment clients over three months.

Q: Why are these disputes important?

A: Disputes can indicate potential friction or complexity in financial transactions between institutions.

Q: How often is this data updated?

A: Typically reported quarterly by financial institutions and regulatory bodies.

Q: What types of clients are included?

A: Mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments are covered in this series.

Q: How can investors use this information?

A: Helps assess potential risks and transaction complexities in institutional investing.

Related News

Related Trends

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

OTCDQ51DDCNR

19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: First in Importance

ALLQ19B2MINR

11) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Trading REITs as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Considerably

CTQ11ECNR

39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

ALLQ39ADSNR

21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

CTQ21DDSNR

56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

ALLQ56A3TSNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (CTQ39DDCNR), retrieved from FRED.