40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading Reits. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ40CDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes duration for trading REITs. Provides insights into financial transaction complexity and dispute resolution trends.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures the frequency and intensity of disputes in real estate investment trust trading transactions. Indicates potential market friction or resolution efficiency.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions reporting dispute changes.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to assess trading relationship stability.
Key Facts
- Tracks dispute changes in trading REITs
- Indicates transactional relationship dynamics
- Survey-based financial metric
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for trading REITs over three months.
Q: Why are these dispute metrics important?
A: They reveal potential friction or efficiency in financial transactions and trading relationships.
Q: How is the data collected?
A: Through surveys of financial institutions reporting dispute characteristics.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Regulators, investors, and financial analysts monitoring market transaction dynamics.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically reported quarterly with changes in dispute duration and persistence.
Related Trends
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ19A72MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ66A1ECNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ19B12MINR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ62A3TSNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ31B42MINR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ25A1MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ40CDCNR), retrieved from FRED.