39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

CTQ39BISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

4.00

Year-over-Year Change

0.00%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025

Summary

Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes volume with hedge fund clients. Provides insight into financial service interactions and potential market friction.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This metric measures the frequency and intensity of financial disputes between institutions and hedge fund clients over valuation and collateral.

Methodology

Collected through quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volume changes.

Historical Context

Used to assess financial market tension and client relationship dynamics.

Key Facts

  • Quarterly tracking of financial disputes
  • Focuses specifically on hedge fund interactions
  • Indicates potential market stress indicators

FAQs

Q: What does this series measure?

A: Tracks volume changes in mark and collateral disputes with hedge fund clients over three months.

Q: Why are these disputes important?

A: They can signal potential tensions or valuation challenges in financial markets.

Q: How often is this data updated?

A: Typically updated quarterly through financial institution surveys.

Q: What insights can be gained?

A: Provides early indicators of financial market friction and client relationship dynamics.

Q: Are all disputes significant?

A: Not all disputes indicate serious problems; context and magnitude matter.

Related News

Related Trends

24) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Insurance Companies Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Considerably

ALLQ24ECNR

66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

SFQ66B2RBUNR

66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

SFQ66B1ESNR

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably

ALLQ51CICNR

69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

SFQ69RBUNR

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

OTCDQ51DRBUNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (CTQ39BISNR), retrieved from FRED.
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat | US Economic Trends