39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ39BISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
4.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes volume with hedge fund clients. Provides insight into financial service interactions and potential market friction.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures the frequency and intensity of financial disputes between institutions and hedge fund clients over valuation and collateral.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volume changes.
Historical Context
Used to assess financial market tension and client relationship dynamics.
Key Facts
- Quarterly tracking of financial disputes
- Focuses specifically on hedge fund interactions
- Indicates potential market stress indicators
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks volume changes in mark and collateral disputes with hedge fund clients over three months.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: They can signal potential tensions or valuation challenges in financial markets.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly through financial institution surveys.
Q: What insights can be gained?
A: Provides early indicators of financial market friction and client relationship dynamics.
Q: Are all disputes significant?
A: Not all disputes indicate serious problems; context and magnitude matter.
Related News

Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...

S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...

U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...

U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...

U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...

U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
24) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Insurance Companies Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ24ECNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ66B2RBUNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66B1ESNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ51CICNR
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ69RBUNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ51DRBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (CTQ39BISNR), retrieved from FRED.