39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ39BISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
4.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes volume with hedge fund clients. Provides insight into financial service interactions and potential market friction.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures the frequency and intensity of financial disputes between institutions and hedge fund clients over valuation and collateral.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volume changes.
Historical Context
Used to assess financial market tension and client relationship dynamics.
Key Facts
- Quarterly tracking of financial disputes
- Focuses specifically on hedge fund interactions
- Indicates potential market stress indicators
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks volume changes in mark and collateral disputes with hedge fund clients over three months.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: They can signal potential tensions or valuation challenges in financial markets.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly through financial institution surveys.
Q: What insights can be gained?
A: Provides early indicators of financial market friction and client relationship dynamics.
Q: Are all disputes significant?
A: Not all disputes indicate serious problems; context and magnitude matter.
Related Trends
18) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ18ECNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ70A1ECNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ62A4ECNR
42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC FX Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ42BISNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ51BICNR
2) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Amount of Resources and Attention Your Firm Devotes to Management of Concentrated Credit Exposure to Central Counterparties and Other Financial Utilities Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ02DSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (CTQ39BISNR), retrieved from FRED.