Number of Respondents, Quarterly, Not Seasonally Adjusted
CTQ31B5NINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 10/1/2011
Summary
This economic indicator tracks the number of survey respondents on a quarterly basis without seasonal adjustments. The metric provides insights into data collection methodologies and potential sampling variations across different economic research contexts.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The trend represents a raw count of survey participants, which can be critical for understanding statistical reliability and sampling depth in economic research. Economists use this metric to assess the robustness of underlying data collection processes and potential representativeness of economic surveys.
Methodology
Data is collected through systematic quarterly surveys, with respondents counted without applying seasonal adjustment techniques.
Historical Context
This indicator helps researchers and policymakers evaluate the statistical integrity and potential bias in economic research and survey-based economic analysis.
Key Facts
- Provides a raw count of survey participants
- Collected on a quarterly basis
- Not seasonally adjusted
FAQs
Q: What does this trend specifically measure?
A: It measures the total number of survey respondents in a given quarter without applying seasonal adjustments to the data.
Q: Why is the number of respondents important?
A: The number of respondents indicates the statistical reliability and potential representativeness of economic surveys and research.
Q: How is this data typically used?
A: Researchers and economists use this metric to assess the depth and potential bias in economic survey methodologies.
Q: What limitations exist in this data?
A: The raw count does not account for potential sampling biases or qualitative variations among respondents.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: The data is updated quarterly, providing a consistent snapshot of survey participation rates.
Related News
U.S. jobless claims decline to lowest level since mid-July
U.S. Jobless Claims Drop: A Positive Sign for Economic Growth The U.S. economy is signaling a positive turn as the initial jobless claims have drop...
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
Related Trends
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ37A5MINR
34) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Investment Advisers Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ34ICNR
65) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Somewhat
SFQ65MONR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ19B13MINR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ74B3TSNR
38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ38RBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Number of Respondents, Quarterly, Not Seasonally Adjusted [CTQ31B5NINR], retrieved from FRED.
Last Checked: 8/1/2025