38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ38RBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
20.00
Year-over-Year Change
-9.09%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures corporate negotiation intensity for pricing and terms. Provides insights into business strategy and market competitive dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks how nonfinancial corporations approach price and nonprice term negotiations. It reflects corporate strategic behavior.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly survey of corporate decision-makers.
Historical Context
Used by economists to understand corporate behavior and market conditions.
Key Facts
- Quarterly corporate negotiation survey
- Tracks pricing and nonprice term changes
- Indicates corporate strategic approaches
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It tracks changes in nonfinancial corporations' negotiation intensity for pricing and terms.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: The indicator is typically updated on a quarterly basis through corporate surveys.
Q: Why are corporate negotiations important?
A: They reflect market competitiveness, economic conditions, and business strategy adaptations.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Economists, business strategists, and market analysts use this indicator.
Q: What are the data's potential limitations?
A: Survey-based data represents perceptions and may not capture all market nuances.
Related Trends
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ19A12MINR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ52B4TCNR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ43AICNR
23) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Insurance Companies as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ23TCNR
53) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ53RBUNR
55) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the High-Grade Corporate Bond Market Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ55RBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Negotiation Intensity (ALLQ38RBUNR), retrieved from FRED.