31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ31B43MINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
1/1/2012 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in internal treasury funding charges for investment accounts. Provides insights into financial institution cost structures and lending conditions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures variations in internal funding costs for investment management. It reflects institutional financial strategies and market pricing.
Methodology
Data collected through survey responses from financial institutions and investment professionals.
Historical Context
Used by economists to understand financial institution funding dynamics.
Key Facts
- Reflects internal funding cost changes
- Important for understanding investment account pricing
- Indicates financial institution strategies
FAQs
Q: What are internal treasury charges?
A: Internal treasury charges are costs financial institutions incur for managing and allocating funds.
Q: How do these charges impact investors?
A: Lower charges can lead to more favorable investment account terms and reduced costs.
Q: Why track treasury funding charges?
A: They provide insights into financial institution cost structures and market conditions.
Q: How frequently do these charges change?
A: Charges can fluctuate based on market conditions and institutional strategies.
Q: Are these charges standardized across institutions?
A: Charges vary between financial institutions based on their specific business models.
Related Trends
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading REITs Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ13A1MINR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. CMBS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ79FDCNR
30) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
CTQ30TSNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ74B2ECNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ19A7MINR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ19B23MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Treasury Funding Charges (CTQ31B43MINR), retrieved from FRED.